Ambiguously Disgruntled Manifesto

wasting your time since 1975

12/16/2002

Well, I haven't posted results in a couple weeks, because participation has been minimal and/or nonexistent, but here are the results from this weekend of NFL games: (season totals in parantheses, to be elligible for season totals, you must have participated in more than half of the weeks -- aka at least 7 of 12)


Jake (That's Me!)
12 (212/360 = .589)

Greg
14 (NA)

DanG
23 (168/330 = .509)

Tyler : send me your picks, Chumpzilla!
(91/210 = .433)

Tad : send me your picks, Chumpzilla!
(NA)

Using my amazingly complicated and highly secretive formula to calculate "first place points," here are the standings in that race:
1) DanG and Jake -- 2 pts each
2) Tyler and Tad -- 1.75 pts each
3) Greg -- 1.25 pts

AND! I never posted the final PAC-10 standings. The regular season is long over -- but stay tuned for Bowl Game Pick 'Em -- so here 's how it wraps up:
(there were a max of 266 pts available, to be eligible for the season totals, one must have participated in 5 of the 9 weeks, or 138 of the points, due to three 26-point weeks, and the bonus 8-point WSU-UCLA game... is that all complicated enough?)

Jake (That's me!)
186/266 = .699

Tyler
158/202 = .782

Tad
73/112 = NA

Greg
NA

DanG
160/258 = .620

So Tyler is the big Weiner!

Using the overly-complicated and needlessly secretive formula for "first place points," here are the final standing in that race:
1) Tyler 3.625 pts
2) DanG 2.125 pts
3) Jake (that's me!) 1.75 pts

I don't know what this means. Way back in September, I said something about all weekly winers being eligible to "win" whatever the "prize" was, in addition to the season totals winner. Soooo... if I were to hold a "random drawing" where the number of "raffle tickets" was determined by the above "first place points," I guess... I don't know how that would work...

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home